Volume 7, Issue 3, June 2019, Page: 68-74
The Evaluation of Safety Barriers Using the Method Lopa Case: Haoud Berkaoui in Sonatrach
Samia Hariz, Institute of Hygiene and Safety Industrially, Batna 2 University, Batna, Algeria
Fares Telli, Institute of Hygiene and Safety Industrially, Batna 2 University, Batna, Algeria
Received: Jun. 17, 2019;       Accepted: Jul. 18, 2019;       Published: Sep. 19, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190703.12      View  36      Downloads  10
Abstract
Nowadays, the industrial world has developed awareness to risk and risk management especially to major risks with catastrophic consequences. Because of this; great efforts has been put to prevent and protect against these risks. The analysis and evaluation of risks are an essential steps to prevent the occurrence or to the reduce severity of the accidents, several methods are used to analyze and evaluate risk, they are divided into three categories qualitative, semi quantitative and quantitative. These methods differ in when, where and why to apply them, qualitative methods are generally easy to apply and fast in identifying the risks, quantitative methods are not as easy but provide a numerical value to the risk that helps in risk comparison in the case of evaluation or decision-making, and semi quantitative methods falls in between. In this framework the objective is to evaluate the performance of the safety barriers using layer of protection analysis (LOPA). It was applied on Haoud Berkaoui in Sonatrach one of the leading companies in oil and gas industry in Africa, we have chosen the new flared gas recovery project as the subject of our study as it is new and no previous work has been done on this subject, we have identified its most critical system and it was the separator V-160, this separator is crucial to the hole operating station, as it holds all the condensate at the end of the operation. We established a HAZOP study and we rely on it to realize LOPA that should be a step for organizations to move towards more semiquantitative and quantitative analysis. So we will try to realize this abstract method in the field. Hopefully this work can contribute to the company applied upon.
Keywords
The Safety Barriers, Companies of Oil and Gas, Lopa
To cite this article
Samia Hariz, Fares Telli, The Evaluation of Safety Barriers Using the Method Lopa Case: Haoud Berkaoui in Sonatrach, International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis. Vol. 7, No. 3, 2019, pp. 68-74. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190703.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Richard Gowland The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS) /layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: A step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment, 2006, Elsevier.
[2]
Mohammad Yazdi, The Application of Bow-Tie Method in Hydrogen Sulfide Risk Management Using Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 2017.
[3]
Adam S. Markowski, M. Sam Mannan, ExSys-LOPA for the chemical process industry, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Elseveir 2010.
[4]
Andrew Franks. Lines of Defence/Layers of Protection Analysis in the COMAH Context. Warrington. 1999.
[5]
Benabid. M. Analyse des risques lies a l'exploitation des compresseurs K 101 A/B au station boosting HBK. 2016.
[6]
Bourareche. M. Apports des techniques floues et possibilistes a l'analyse seni-quantitative des risques industriels. Magister's thesis defended at the University of El Hadj Lakhdar, Batna. 2017.
[7]
BP. Guidance on Practices for Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA). British Petroleum procedure: Engineering Technical Practice (ETP) GP 48-03, 1st edition. 2016.
[8]
http://www.zeeco.com/pdfs/HE-January-2015.pdf
[9]
CCPS. Guidelines for Initiating Events and Independent Protection Layers in Layer Of Protection Analysis. The American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York. 2015.
[10]
CCPS. Guidelines for process equipment reliability data with data tables. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York 2017.
[11]
CCPS. Layer of protection analysis, simplified process risk assessment. American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). 3 Park Avenue, New York. 2017.
[12]
http://www.processengr.com/ppt_presentations/safety_lifecycle_training_2015.pdf
[13]
OREDA. Offshore reliability data handbook, 4th Edition. 2002.
[14]
Sklet, S. 2006: 3, Safety Barriers on Oil and Gas Platforms. PhD thesis, NTNU. 2016.
[15]
Summers, A. Introduction to layers of protection analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 104: 163–168. 2013.
[16]
The Dow chemical company. Introducing dow application of layer of protection analysis. In Introducing Dow Application of Layer of Protection Analysis - LOPA. 2012.
[17]
Christoffer Clarin. Application of Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) for subsea production systems. Master's thesis defended at Lund University. 2016.
[18]
Christopher A. Lassen. Layer of protection analysis (LOPA) for determination of safety integrity level (SIL). Master's thesis defended at The Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 2016.
[19]
Dennis P. Nolan, P. E. Application of HAZOP and what-if safety review to the petroleum, petrochemical and chemical industries. New Jersey. 1994.
[20]
Dowell, A. and Williams, T. Layer of Protection Analysis: Generating Scenarios Automatically from HAZOP Data. Process Safety Progress, 24: 38–44. 2005.
[21]
SONATRACH. SONATRACH DP HBK. 2017.
[22]
Dowell, A. Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level. ISA Transactions, 37: 155–165. 1998.
[23]
Exida. Safety Equipment Reliability Handbook. 2nd Edition. 2015.
[24]
Gowland, R. The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS) / layer of protection analysis (LOPA) me 1 hodology: A step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment? Journal of azardous Materials, 130: 307–310. 2016.
[25]
IEC 61508. Functional safety of electrical / electronic / programmable electronic safety-related systems. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva. 2013.
[26]
SONATRACH. SONATRACH DP HBK. 2017.
[27]
IEC 61511. Functional safety - safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva. (1998-2003).
Browse journals by subject